Very interesting! I think I have read comments elsewhere that Trilian sounds more realistic! Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts! SvenH wrote:Why do you prefer Scarbee basses over those in Trilian? The idea is more of tweaking the interface as a bass player would probably just bring like one or two basses to a gig but can get an infinite number of sounds depending on how he tweaks pickups, plays strings.

My brother a bass player heard my tracks using Scarbee and thought I hired a great bass player.Īlso Trilian is more of a preset machine and will have like hundreds of presets where NI will only give you a few just like a real bass. Trilian is nowhere as expressive as Scarbee but it has probably more samples but it feels more like playing a great Sample library on an old Akai, where NI almost takes the Sample library concept and adds the ability to do slides and has a more realistic legato feel to it. The Scarbee basses highlights some of the best uses for NI scripting. You often have to read the documentation to learn it’s tricks but when you learn them, they add realism like no other sample libraries. That said NI instruments have a learning curve and are more like synths and playing a video game with hidden cheat codes. If you are a great keyboardist, you can make Trilian sound real but IMO KSP makes it easier. Trilian is great as well but sounds more like a keyboardist playing a electric bass Sample. The NI basses sound almost like real basses played by great players and makes extensive use of KSP scripting for added realism. Why do you prefer Scarbee basses over those in Trilian? I think Trilian has better acoustic basses but I don’t really have a NI acoustic library to compare with just the factory stuff. I especially love the synth basses of Trilian.

Jlgrimes wrote:For electric basses I like the NI Scarbee basses the best.

Trilian vst bass